Re: blocking INSERTs

From: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
To: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: blocking INSERTs
Date: 2005-06-08 05:40:04
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0506080731080.7072-100000@zigo.dhs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Joseph Shraibman wrote:

> BEGIN;
> SELECT ... FROM table WHERE a = 1 FOR UPDATE;
> UPDATE table SET ... WHERE a = 1;
> if that resturns zero then
> INSERT INTO table (...) VALUES (...);
> END;
>
> The problem is that I need to avoid race conditions. Sometimes I get
> primary key exceptions on the INSERT.

PG uses row locking and the problem above is that if there is no row with
a=1 then there is no row to lock in the first select. The update will
update zero rows and then the you come to the insert and nothing is locked
so 2 transactions can do the insert at the same time. This means that one
of the 2 transactions will fail.

If you use pg 8.0 maybe this example might help you:

http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-control-structures.html#PLPGSQL-UPSERT-EXAMPLE

and if not you are correct that you need to lock the table (or just accept
that it fail sometimes and handle that failure in the client).

--
/Dennis

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-06-08 06:12:04 Re: Postgres 8.0.1 configure failed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-08 05:28:56 Re: return two elements