From: | Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, David Roussel <pgsql-performance(at)diroussel(dot)xsmail(dot)com>, Mischa Sandberg <mischa(dot)sandberg(at)telus(dot)net>, pgsql-perform <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: COPY vs INSERT |
Date: | 2005-05-06 07:30:46 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0505060927520.7072-100000@zigo.dhs.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Has thought been given to supporting inserting multiple rows in a single
> insert? DB2 supported:
>
> INSERT INTO table VALUES(
> (1,2,3),
> (4,5,6),
> (7,8,9)
> );
>
> I'm not sure how standard that is or if other databases support it.
The sql standard include this, except that you can not have the outer ().
So it should be
INSERT INTO table VALUES
(1,2,3),
(4,5,6),
(7,8,9);
Do DB2 demand these extra ()?
--
/Dennis Björklund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jona | 2005-05-06 07:34:34 | Re: Bad choice of query plan from PG 7.3.6 to PG 7.3.9 |
Previous Message | Jona | 2005-05-06 07:28:06 | Re: Bad choice of query plan from PG 7.3.6 to PG 7.3.9 |