From: | Achilleus Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Timestamp with timezone question. |
Date: | 2005-02-22 08:24:11 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0502221022290.7436-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
O Bruno Wolff III έγραψε στις Feb 22, 2005 :
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 16:16:04 +0200,
> Achilleus Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Since pgsql always converts a timestamptz to UTC, we have lost
> > the information of the Sender's local timezone.
> >
> > Should i go with a separete date and timetz ?
>
> Someone else gave you a recommended solution.
>
> However there was a discussion on the order of 6 months ago about changing
> the timestamptz type to keep this information. Nothing will be changing
> in the near future, but you may (or may not) find the discussion useful.
Thanx,
i'll check it out sometime.
Apart from that, having a new (version of a) type (timestamptz)
just to provide a convinience function isnt too useful.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
--
-Achilleus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-22 08:42:50 | Re: pg primary key bug? |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-02-22 06:59:46 | Re: Timestamp with timezone question. |