Re: Horribly slow hash join

From: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Horribly slow hash join
Date: 2004-04-18 15:58:38
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0404181757110.4551-100000@zigo.dhs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> That creates portability issues though. We do not depend on there being
> a 64-bit-int type for anything except int8 itself, and I don't want to
> start doing so.

What do you mean? int8 is supported on all platformas and if the
hasfunction would convert all numbers to int8 before making the hash it
would work.

I don't see any portability problems.

--
/Dennis Björklund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-18 16:23:39 Re: Horribly slow hash join
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-18 15:46:35 Re: Horribly slow hash join