From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.4 official docs : Fonts? |
Date: | 2003-11-19 23:12:59 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311200012050.21224-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-www |
Josh Berkus writes:
> Elein is correct, our variety of styles does look odd and can cause issues
> with readability. See, for example,
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-string.html
>
> Can we experiment with different SGML-to-HMTL font styles to find one that's a
> little easier on the eyes? What I find particularly difficult are the
> function parameter columns; the mix of "normal" italics with "bold" italics.
Compare with the "original" version:
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/functions-string.html
That looks fairly reasonable to me. So the problem appears to be in the
CSS stylesheets.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-20 00:10:18 | Re: 7.4 official docs : Fonts? |
Previous Message | Randolf Richardson, DevNet SysOp 29 | 2003-11-19 22:38:12 | Re: 7.4 official docs : Fonts? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-19 23:29:02 | Fwd: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts? |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-11-19 22:53:55 | Re: Site designs, upgrades, and Konqueror |