| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release cycle length |
| Date: | 2003-11-18 00:44:48 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311180141560.639-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Marc G. Fournier writes:
> That is the usual goal *nod* Same goal we try for each release, and never
> quite seem to get there ... we'll try 'yet again' with 7.5 though, as we
> always do :)
I don't see how we could have tried for a 4-month development period and
ended up with an 8-month period. Something went *really* wrong there.
Part of that may have been that few people were actually aware of that
schedule.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-18 00:47:08 | Re: Release cycle length |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-18 00:37:20 | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-18 00:47:08 | Re: Release cycle length |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-18 00:24:21 | Re: Release cycle length |