ow writes:
> That's the whole point: I'm trying to avoid maintaining *separate* connection
> pools for each db. In other words, instead of having, say, 5 connection pools
> to 5 dbs with total of 1000 connections, I could've used just one (1) pool with
> 200 connections, if there was a way to "switch db" (or to do a cross-db query).
I'm afraid that what you want to do is not possible. Perhaps you want to
organize your data into schemas, not databases.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net