Re: GUIDs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUIDs
Date: 2003-11-14 01:30:01
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311140228540.17499-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

David Wheeler writes:

> bytea with the binary or the hex?

Binary or hex what?

> And isn't it a bit of a waste to add the extra 4 bytes when I'll only
> ever need 16?

Sure, but if you want to avoid that, you'll have to implement your own
data type. Actually, I think someone has already done that for GUID. If
you search the archives you might find out about it.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

  • Re: GUIDs at 2003-11-14 01:08:22 from David Wheeler

Responses

  • Re: GUIDs at 2003-11-14 01:34:22 from David Wheeler

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Wheeler 2003-11-14 01:34:22 Re: GUIDs
Previous Message David Wheeler 2003-11-14 01:08:22 Re: GUIDs