Re: C functions quicker than Plpgsql?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Martin Hart <martin(at)zsdfherg(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: C functions quicker than Plpgsql?
Date: 2003-11-03 20:38:58
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311032138200.12750-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Martin Hart writes:

> I am wondering what the performance benefits are of implementing such a
> function in C using the SPI vs plpgsql.

plpgsql is itself implemented in C using SPI. So you do the math.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Koizar 2003-11-03 20:45:08 Re: Help on update that subselects other records in table, uses joins
Previous Message Martin Marques 2003-11-03 20:26:40 Re: Constraint Problem