Re: Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test
Date: 2003-10-31 23:01:43
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311010000500.1528-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> nothing happens, because the revoke is implicitly assumed to mean
> "revoke whatever privileges I granted", and Larry's superuser hasn't
> granted any. The public privileges on language SQL were granted by
> user postgres, and they remain in force. So the later CREATE FUNCTION
> that the test expects to fail, succeeds.
>
> Is this a bug, or is it correct-per-spec behavior?

It's correct.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-31 23:16:41 Re: Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-31 22:49:09 Re: out of date bufmgr README