From: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
Date: | 2003-10-27 18:20:51 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0310272002430.19831-100000@emo.org.tr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> How do we evaluate those classes? Is someone going to be there? We can
> look at the printed curriculum, but do we know the instructor can answer
> a reasonable question _not_ on the curriculum? How do we tell a company
> we will _not_ cerify their course?
What about certifiying the instructor first? I mean: 'PGDG Certified
Instructors'. If I'm a PGDG Certified instructor, everyone should be sure
that I could answare almost 'any' question about PostgreSQL.
Ok, let's see the point: We are running an open-source product, that has
no company with it. I'd prefer a class that will be certified by a company
or Development Group. For example, there are a lot of Linux Classes in
here; but when I feel that I need to take a certificate, I'd prefer Red
Hat's exams. So, there may be a lot of PostgreSQL classes everywhere --but
I'm pretty sure that people will choose a (PGDG) certified class.
All you need to say is 'PGDG Certifies XX Company's Courses'; you do not
need to announce the opposite.
Regards,
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org devrim(dot)gunduz(at)linux(dot)org(dot)tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/nWIEtl86P3SPfQ4RAoHzAKCkqfRNYM7vRNx7+R7hHiXB7P4jigCfdnt3
yeAiTbOJ4GdCrSDe0LIJQ7A=
=+E3H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Bernier | 2003-10-27 20:33:17 | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-27 18:04:08 | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |