Re: PostgreSQL Certification

From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Date: 2003-10-27 18:20:51
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0310272002430.19831-100000@emo.org.tr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> How do we evaluate those classes? Is someone going to be there? We can
> look at the printed curriculum, but do we know the instructor can answer
> a reasonable question _not_ on the curriculum? How do we tell a company
> we will _not_ cerify their course?

What about certifiying the instructor first? I mean: 'PGDG Certified
Instructors'. If I'm a PGDG Certified instructor, everyone should be sure
that I could answare almost 'any' question about PostgreSQL.

Ok, let's see the point: We are running an open-source product, that has
no company with it. I'd prefer a class that will be certified by a company
or Development Group. For example, there are a lot of Linux Classes in
here; but when I feel that I need to take a certificate, I'd prefer Red
Hat's exams. So, there may be a lot of PostgreSQL classes everywhere --but
I'm pretty sure that people will choose a (PGDG) certified class.

All you need to say is 'PGDG Certifies XX Company's Courses'; you do not
need to announce the opposite.

Regards,
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org devrim(dot)gunduz(at)linux(dot)org(dot)tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/nWIEtl86P3SPfQ4RAoHzAKCkqfRNYM7vRNx7+R7hHiXB7P4jigCfdnt3
yeAiTbOJ4GdCrSDe0LIJQ7A=
=+E3H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Bernier 2003-10-27 20:33:17 Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-27 18:04:08 Re: PostgreSQL Certification