Re: Call for port reports

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Noèl Köthe <noel(at)debian(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for port reports
Date: 2003-10-26 00:21:26
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0310260218540.18767-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> I can't certify the following platform because it doesn't recognize our
> spinlock code. Would you run src/tools/ccsym and report back the
> symbols you have. Do you not have __powerpc__ defined?

The way I read his report (a little tricky to find the divisions) is that
ppc has passed and parisc64 doesn't have spinlock code, which sounds a
lot more credible.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-26 00:29:28 Re: Call for port reports
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-26 00:20:34 Re: Call for port reports