Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Tommi Mäkitalo <t(dot)maekitalo(at)epgmbh(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
Date: 2003-09-04 17:50:38
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0309041950020.1488-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> > What is the problem? Is it that a non-IPv6 enabled postmaster is unable
> > to identify or parse valid IPv6 address specifications? In that case,
> > we need to provide some substitute routines.
>
> To what purpose?

So we can put ::1 in the default pg_hba.conf and have it work on
IPv6-enabled hosts by default.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-09-04 17:53:29 Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2003-09-04 17:49:15 Re: ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?