Re: Passing server_encoding to the client is not future-proof

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Passing server_encoding to the client is not future-proof
Date: 2003-08-31 19:09:58
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0308312109270.1119-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Tom Lane writes:

> The JDBC guys wanted to know it. Why is not clear to me, but I figured
> it was easy enough to make them happy.

The JDBC guys didn't respond, and I don't see it used in their source
code, so I'm inclined to remove it.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ohp 2003-08-31 20:18:40 dns prob
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-08-31 19:09:16 Re: Passing server_encoding to the client is not future-proof

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message joe user 2003-09-01 01:53:16 A JDBC bug or problem relating to string length in Java vs. PG (long)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-08-31 19:06:17 Re: Passing server_encoding to the client is not future-proof