| From: | Michael Pohl <pgsql(at)newtopia(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Apparently the real competition is Sybase... |
| Date: | 2003-08-22 01:44:20 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0308212134160.23311-100000@server1.techplant.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 21 Aug 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> To be honest I can't recall ever using it, but I can't imagine sybase
> having better scaling, data protection, or better SQL command set than
> postgresql. Anyone have the insider knowledge on what makes sybase so
> good or can we chalk this one up to the "clueless pundit" factor?
My employer is (and by association I am as well) a long-time user of
Sybase for internal workflow, Peoplesoft integration, and e-commerce
projects. When I first started knocking around with db-driven stuff for
my own web projects about four years ago, I used MySQL. Then I started
missing the stored procedures, triggers, transactions, foreign keys and
the like that I was used to with Sybase. So I migrated to PostgreSQL.
I've had very positive experiences with both Sybase and PostgreSQL. I've
never had to administer Sybase though, so I can't speak to that.
michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Autoresponder | 2003-08-22 01:46:28 | Re: Your application |
| Previous Message | Autoresponder | 2003-08-22 01:21:26 | Re: Wicked screensaver |