Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...

From: Michael Pohl <michael(at)newtopia(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...
Date: 2003-07-07 03:13:07
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0307062249060.8634-100000@server1.techplant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Matthew Nuzum wrote:

> At the very least, if there is good documentation for these parameters,
> maybe the conf file should provide a link to this info.

I believe that is what Josh is proposing:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2003-07/msg00102.php

> [Apache httpd] uses a three phase (if not more) documentation level.
> The .conf file contains detailed instructions in an easy to read and
> not-to-jargon-ish structure. The docs provide detailed tutorials and
> papers that expand on configuration params in an easy to read format.
> Both of these refer to the thorough reference manual that breaks each
> possible option down into it's nitty gritty details so that a user can
> get more information if they so desire.

I agree that Apache's approach is primo. Often the .conf comments are
enough to jog my memory about a directive I haven't used for a while. Or
the comments are enough to let me know I don't need a directive, or that I
need to go to the manual and read more. I appreciate that.

michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Foster 2003-07-07 03:42:47 Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...
Previous Message Matthew Nuzum 2003-07-07 02:33:13 Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...