From: | Michael Pohl <michael(at)newtopia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003... |
Date: | 2003-07-07 03:13:07 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0307062249060.8634-100000@server1.techplant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
> At the very least, if there is good documentation for these parameters,
> maybe the conf file should provide a link to this info.
I believe that is what Josh is proposing:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2003-07/msg00102.php
> [Apache httpd] uses a three phase (if not more) documentation level.
> The .conf file contains detailed instructions in an easy to read and
> not-to-jargon-ish structure. The docs provide detailed tutorials and
> papers that expand on configuration params in an easy to read format.
> Both of these refer to the thorough reference manual that breaks each
> possible option down into it's nitty gritty details so that a user can
> get more information if they so desire.
I agree that Apache's approach is primo. Often the .conf comments are
enough to jog my memory about a directive I haven't used for a while. Or
the comments are enough to let me know I don't need a directive, or that I
need to go to the manual and read more. I appreciate that.
michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Foster | 2003-07-07 03:42:47 | Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003... |
Previous Message | Matthew Nuzum | 2003-07-07 02:33:13 | Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003... |