| From: | sumit <sumit(at)gdit(dot)iiit(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch for adding DATACUBE operator |
| Date: | 2003-06-30 16:03:49 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0306302132010.22358-100000@students.iiit.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Thanks for letting know. Could you also let me know the exact
syntax, I mean, we are not sure whether GROUP BY CUBE(...) is followed by
a HAVING clause. Kindly inform us soon so that we can make the changes and
send you the updated patch and files.
Sumit
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> SQL99 defines a GROUP BY CUBE(...) operation, which seems to do the same
> thing as this. Why are you using a nonstandard syntax?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-06-30 16:48:40 | Re: Patch for adding DATACUBE operator |
| Previous Message | Carlos Guzman Alvarez | 2003-06-30 15:11:21 | Re: Question about array read using protocol 3.0 implementation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-06-30 16:35:51 | Postgresql.conf, initdb patch |
| Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-06-30 15:46:52 | Re: pgAdmin3 translation request into Russian |