Re: PlPython

From: Kevin Jacobs <jacobs(at)penguin(dot)theopalgroup(dot)com>
To: DeJuan Jackson <djackson(at)speedfc(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <joconnor(at)cybermesa(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PlPython
Date: 2003-06-26 17:04:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0306261303140.4662-100000@penguin.theopalgroup.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, DeJuan Jackson wrote:
> Just wondering (I don't use or intend to use plpython), but why does it
> need to be marked untrusted is the rexec code has been corrected.

No corrected -- removed. Rexec is and will likely remain broken for at
least one more Python release. Thus, it was decided to remove all support
for it in Python, and consequently from PlPython.

-Kevin

--
--
Kevin Jacobs
The OPAL Group - Enterprise Systems Architect
Voice: (216) 986-0710 x 19 E-mail: jacobs(at)theopalgroup(dot)com
Fax: (216) 986-0714 WWW: http://www.theopalgroup.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2003-06-26 17:23:27 Re: PlPython
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-26 17:03:48 Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-06-26 17:04:18 Re: [HACKERS] ECPG and bytea
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-26 17:03:48 Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration