Re: OS/X and PL/PGSQL

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OS/X and PL/PGSQL
Date: 2003-04-11 01:20:09
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0304101528440.2212-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane writes:

> Not sure if this is true on OS/X, but on many Unixen, the dynamic loader
> will write failure messages on stderr that are much more useful than the
> narrow-band error indicator returned to the calling code. Make sure
> your setup is sending postmaster stderr to a file, not /dev/null, and
> then look in the file to see if this produces any interesting output.

Or maybe it's because of this?

char *
pg_dlerror(void)
{
return "no error message available";
}

;-)

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jack Dull 2003-04-11 01:33:02 what is wrong with data type 'array' ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-10 23:26:19 Re: Batch replication ordering (was Re: [GENERAL] 32/64-bit transaction IDs?)