From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: more contrib: log rotator |
Date: | 2003-04-05 00:03:03 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0304050200300.1945-200000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> AFAICS, the only practical way to do this is to have a single process
> collecting the stdout/stderr from the postmaster and all its children.
I think not. It's a little tricky handling it directly in the child
processes, but it's been done before.
> If someone can offer a better alternative than Andrew's, great, let's
> see it.
How about the attached one, which I floated a while ago but which didn't
generate much interest.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_logpipe.c | text/plain | 2.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-05 00:22:58 | Re: more contrib: log rotator |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-04 23:37:17 | Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch |