| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Murthy Kambhampaty <murthy(dot)kambhampaty(at)goeci(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Speed & Memory Management |
| Date: | 2003-04-02 22:23:19 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0304030022220.3656-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Murthy Kambhampaty writes:
> This, and the message from Tom Lane, seem inconsistent with the
> documentation re "Character Types"
> (http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/datatype-character.html)
> which says:
>
> "Tip: There are no performance differences between these three types, apart
> from the increased storage size when using the blank-padded type."
What are you saying? This is exactly true. Of course the padding might
also take time, not only space, but we don't want to get too picky here.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Biagioni | 2003-04-02 22:24:22 | Re: Speed & Memory Management |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-04-02 22:20:40 | Re: Speed & Memory Management |