Re: Win32 port patches submitted

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 port patches submitted
Date: 2003-01-21 17:40:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0301211837030.789-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck writes:

> I just submitted the patches for the native Win32 port of v7.2.1 on the
> patches mailing list.

I'm concerned that you are adding all these *.dsp files for build process
control. This is going to be a burden to maintain. Everytime someone
changes an aspect of how a file is built the Windows port needs to be
fixed. And since the tool that operates on these files is probably not
freely available this will be difficult. I don't see a strong reason not
to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already
requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full
shell environment. A lot of the porting aspects such as substitute
implemenations of the C library functions could be handled nearly for free
using the existing infrastructure and this whole patch would become much
less intimidating.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-21 17:41:24 Re: pg_dump ordering
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-01-21 15:16:31 Re: What goes into the security doc?