Re: Concurrency issues

From: Clarence Gardner <clarence(at)silcom(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Concurrency issues
Date: 2003-01-06 04:20:41
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0301052019290.1399-100000@liberty.sba2.netlojix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> No it doesn't; note the granted=f in row 4. What that row shows is
> that Process 2 is waiting for Process 1 to commit its transaction.
> It does not *have* that lock, it is *waiting* for it.

Thanks, Tom. You answered all four questions at once. Efficient!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nigel J. Andrews 2003-01-06 07:36:16 Re: Fwd: Stock update like application
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-06 04:05:48 Re: Concurrency issues