Robert Treat writes:
> I've never been one for actively going against the sql standards (which
> this case would seem to do) so if it is done lets make sure we add
> documentation to point out that we aren't compliant on this issue.
This could be a reasonable place to hook in the "SQL flagger"
(non-conforming syntax checker), which a conforming SQL implementation
needs to have anyhow.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net