Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces
Date: 2002-12-05 00:01:16
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0212050027160.12428-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier writes:

> It isn't, but those working on -advocacy were asked to help come up with a
> stronger release *announcement* then we've had in the past ...

Consider that a failed experiment. PostgreSQL is driven by the
development group and, to some extent, by the existing user base. The
last thing we need is a marketing department in that mix.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-05 00:23:52 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces
Previous Message Justin Clift 2002-12-04 23:23:03 Re: Links to all these news articles?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Reyes 2002-12-05 00:12:43 Performance list
Previous Message Joseph Shraibman 2002-12-04 23:44:14 Re: performance tuning

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-05 00:23:52 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-12-05 00:00:38 Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?