Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?

From: Helge Bahmann <bahmann(at)math(dot)tu-freiberg(dot)de>
To: Henrik Steffen <steffen(at)city-map(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?
Date: 2002-11-11 11:56:11
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0211111247280.419-100000@hermes.vpn
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

FWIW, in summer I have done a little bit of testing on one of our
dual-cpu machines; among this I have been running OSDB (open source
database benchmark), 32 simulated clients, against Postgres (7.2.1)/Linux
(2.4.18), once bootet with maxcpus=1 and once with maxcpus=2; if I
remember correctly I saw something between 80-90% performance improvement
on the IR benchmark with the second cpu activated.

Note the run was completely cpu-bound, neither harddisk nor memory was the
bottleneck, so you may see less of an improvement if other parts of your
system are the limit; but Postgres itself appears to make use of the
available cpus quite nicely.

Regards
--
Helge Bahmann <bahmann(at)math(dot)tu-freiberg(dot)de> /| \__
The past: Smart users in front of dumb terminals /_|____\
_/\ | __)
$ ./configure \\ \|__/__|
checking whether build environment is sane... yes \\/___/ |
checking for AIX... no (we already did this) |

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message turuki 2002-11-11 12:25:47 Re: PostgreySQl.
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2002-11-11 10:42:39 Re: SQL Tuning

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wei Weng 2002-11-11 17:19:47 Re: Slow response from 'SELECT * FROM table'
Previous Message Jakub Ouhrabka 2002-11-11 10:13:01 Re: Slow response from 'SELECT * FROM table'