Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Billy G(dot) Allie" <Bill(dot)Allie(at)mug(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
Date: 2002-11-09 16:29:28
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0211091708270.12428-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Billy G. Allie writes:

> I disagree that it's a new feature. The code to add the -rpath (-R) option
> was already there. My patch made it more useful in that the additional search
> libraries are now placed in the -rpath (-R) option.

Yeah, you're doing additional things, so it's a new feature. The fact
that you were able to reuse existing code is commendable but does not
create an exception.

> As to doing it on all platforms, that would be a decision for the
> maintainers of that platforms port.

The "rpath" feature behaves consistently across platforms and PostgreSQL
makes consistent use of it, so it does not qualify as a porting issue.
The last thing I'd want to see is that every platform looks for the
libraries in different ways.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-11-09 16:32:34 Re: Win32 port
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-09 16:17:58 Re: Problem with 7.3 on Irix with dates before 1970