From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 |
Date: | 2002-11-06 22:07:13 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0211061819220.1018-100000@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> I'm guessing that what we need to do is -D_GNU_SOURCE somewhere in the
> Makefiles; the $64 question is exactly where (can we restrict it to
> src/pl/plperl?) and what conditions should cause the Makefiles to add
> it? Do we want a configure test?
The simplest choice would be to just define it unconditionally in linux.h.
Since it is not supposed to change any interfaces, just add new ones, this
should be safe. If you don't believe that, then we really need to test
and define _GNU_SOURCE early in configure so the following tests can take
it into account. In either case, the command line is not the place for
it.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-06 23:33:32 | Re: Win32 port |
Previous Message | alex avriette | 2002-11-06 21:51:15 | problem building pg 7.3 beta 3 on solaris 8 -m64 |