Re: /contrib/retep to gborg

On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Dave Page wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> > Sent: 19 October 2002 17:17
> > To: Bruce Momjian
> > Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg
> >
> >
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > I am concerned that removing them may cause instability,
> > particularly
> > > in some of the java build scripts. That's why I am suggesting not
> > > doing it during beta.
> >
> > Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC
> > driver. As long as JDBC is in the main distro, I think we
> > should leave contrib/retep there too.
> >
> > There was some talk of moving JDBC to gborg, but I'm not sure
> > what the plan is, if any.
>
> Marc asked me to sort it along with some other things, but when I spoke
> to Barry he didn't want to move. I passed it back to Marc.

I did say to Marc about removing contrib/retep several months ago, as more
up to date versions have been on sourceforge for almost a year now.

I agree with Bruce about the build scripts, but suggest once everything is
done, to remove them.

Peter

--
Peter Mount
peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
http://www.retep.org.uk/
Tel/Fax: +44 (0) 1622 749439
Mobile: +44 (0) 7903 155887
US Fax: 1 435 304 5165
US Voice: 1 435 304 5165