| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: inline newNode() |
| Date: | 2002-10-11 16:36:48 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0210101943200.928-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I assume the GEQO results he is seeing is only for a tests, and that the
> macro version of newNode will help in all cases.
Well are we just assuming here or are we fixing actual problems based on
real analyses?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | snpe | 2002-10-11 16:48:41 | Re: Out of memory error on huge resultset |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-10-11 16:07:00 | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-10-11 16:41:01 | Re: INSTALL updates |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-10-11 16:07:00 | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |