Re: SSL documentation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bear Giles <bgiles(at)coyotesong(dot)com>, <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSL documentation
Date: 2002-09-24 20:17:18
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0209242014400.1149-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Yep, I am ready to rip, but I need someone who understands SSL to do it
> for me because I don't understand which parts need to be ripped and
> which parts are good.

If we decide to go that route we should revert all the SSL related
patches. We're past the point of figuring out which parts are worthwhile.
It should be relatively possible to figure out which files and revisions
where affected from the CVS logs and the patches list.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-09-24 20:20:11 Re: building beta2 appears to fail in docs:
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-09-24 16:57:25 building beta2 appears to fail in docs: