| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inconsistent Conversion Names |
| Date: | 2002-09-21 18:38:08 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0209211955090.1149-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oleg Bartunov writes:
> > > Someone said that the conversion table is actually koi8r + koi8u,
> > > being different from IANA's koi8_r. Not sure though.
> >
> > I found mention in the archives by Oleg B. that it is in fact koi8_r.
> >
>
> on my system (linux) I have ru_RU.KOI8-R locale.
We're not talking about your system. :-)
Do you know whether PostgreSQL's conversion tables cover koi8-r or koi8-u
or both? The documentation contains contradicting information about that.
Actually, since we use the officially provided Unicode conversion tables,
we should know what they cover.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-21 18:49:20 | Re: pg_dump problems in upgrading |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-21 16:01:28 | NUMERIC's transcendental functions |