Re: unaccent

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: nngodinh(at)tiscali(dot)it
Cc: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unaccent
Date: 2002-09-19 17:53:28
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0209182223370.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

nngodinh(at)tiscali(dot)it writes:

> Not "to_ascii", since there are so many extended UNICODE characters that
> doesn't have any accent and should not be converted to an ASCII character.

Really, the accent conversion should be part of the character set
conversion routines. At least my local iconv does that.

In general, the determination of what is an accent and how to convert it
is both dependent on locale and the intended usage. It's not clear how
that should be handled.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-09-19 17:57:06 Re: Inconsistent Conversion Names
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-09-19 17:41:20 Re: [GENERAL] Memory Errors...