Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jim(at)contactbda(dot)com, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump
Date: 2002-09-16 17:25:48
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0209161907590.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com> writes:
> > This seems like a "must" have option for pg_dump,
> > If I was to create a patch would it make it into 7.3?
>
> I dunno ... I'd like to have it too, but it would break our "no new
> features during beta" rule. Comments anyone?

I do not believe Jim's premise that it would only take a couple of changes
to a couple of queries. Clearly, it would take at least some change to
any query that reads information about schema-aware objects. And it needs
to be made backward compatible. And what about cross-schema dependencies?

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-09-16 17:26:08 Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-09-16 17:25:30 Re: directional marks