Re: current_schemas()

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: current_schemas()
Date: 2002-09-07 19:30:05
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0209071519470.8185-100000@cm-lcon1-46-187.cm.vtr.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rod Taylor dijo:

> On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 14:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/runtime-config.html,
> > the SEARCH_PATH variable description mentions the use of
> > current_schemas(), but this function doesn't exist (or it didn't exist
>
> Heres what I get. Note current_schemas() shows the full search path,
> where current_schema() shows only the first.

Oh, I see. This seems like a bug in the documentation to me. It should
have a cross-reference to the "miscellaneous functions" section, or
mention the usage of the parameter.

I think this is a global and serious bug in the SGML documentation: the
lack of cross references. It seriously decreases the usability of the
documentation system.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"El destino baraja y nosotros jugamos" (A. Schopenhauer)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2002-09-07 19:32:40 Re: Making small bits of code available
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-07 19:27:09 Re: [GENERAL] Making small bits of code available