Re: swedish pg_controldata

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dennis Björklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: swedish pg_controldata
Date: 2002-08-29 22:16:40
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0208291818010.1108-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Dennis Björklund writes:

> Here is a swedish translation for pg_controldata.
>
> Remember to add sv to nls.mk

Will do.

> I never know what version number I should put in to the translation. Now I
> put in "Project-Id-Version: PostgreSQL 7.2.2", but that is not true, and
> 7.3 would not be true either. If someone have a comment about that, please
> tell me.

The authorative answer is that it doesn't matter. The field is there, so
it's reasonable to fill it with something. I suggest that we stick to the
major version of the branch you're working on, so it'd be 7.3 right now
and for the rest of the 7.3.* series.

> I have also added a small patch for some strings that where not marked in
> pg_controldata. I have not added these to the sv.po file.
>
> I think strings like "IN_PRODUCTION" should also be changed in english. I
> would rather have "IN PRODUCTION" or "In production". These strings are
> only for displaying to the user, they don't have to match the #defines in
> the program (like DB_IN_PRODUCTION).

These strings reflect the internal symbols of the values in the respective
field, which, I would say, is an artifact of the original hackish nature
of pg_controldata. But now that it's an official tool we should change
them to something human readable, as you suggest.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-08-29 22:19:34 Re: PostgreSQL spanish translation.
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-08-29 22:15:42 Re: Patch for pt_BR (libpq) - part two