From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: rules regression test fix |
Date: | 2002-08-28 07:03:01 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0208280301220.31970-100000@cm-lcon1-46-187.cm.vtr.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane dijo:
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> > It took me a while for the problem to occur again. I've attached the
> > regression.diffs file that was produced -- any ideas what the problem
> > is?
>
> > SELECT tablename, rulename, definition FROM pg_rules
> > ORDER BY tablename, rulename;
> > ! ERROR: cache lookup of relation 144145 failed
>
> At a guess, something is dropping a table that had a rule just as the
> rules test tries to print out the rule definition.
>
> Do we have any concurrent tests that create/drop views, or tables with
> rules on them?
Yes, alter_table.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"El Maquinismo fue proscrito so pena de cosquilleo hasta la muerte"
(Ijon Tichy en Viajes, Stanislaw Lem)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-28 07:32:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposed GUC Variable |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-28 06:43:27 | Re: rules regression test fix |