From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Large file support available |
Date: | 2002-08-21 20:44:38 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0208212012020.1376-100000@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> Are you sure that backend gains more performance than 1GB segmented
> file (I mean large file support turn on LET_OS_MANAGE_FILESIZE)?
No idea. My change only enables access to large files, it doesn't change
the segmentation logic in the backend. The main use at this point is for
pg_dump-related activities.
In fact, while the large file support API can handle 64-bit offsets, its
availability and use don't guarantee that the file system will support any
particular file size. So the segmentation logic in the backend isn't
going anywhere, as far as I'm concerned.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-08-21 20:44:59 | Re: Large file support available |
Previous Message | Sean Chittenden | 2002-08-21 19:26:26 | Re: CVS broken - large file support? |