Re: [PATCHES] START TRANSACTION

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] START TRANSACTION
Date: 2002-08-04 04:07:49
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0208040007020.29827-100000@cm-lcon1-46-187.cm.vtr.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut dijo:

> Neil Conway writes:
>
> > The attached patch implements START TRANSACTION, per SQL99. The
> > functionality of the command is basically identical to that of
> > BEGIN; it just accepts a few extra options (only one of which
> > PostgreSQL currently implements), and is standards-compliant.
> > The patch includes a simple regression test and documentation.
>
> Very nice patch, but I don't think we need the regression test. It's a
> bit too simple.

That makes me wonder: should I produce some regression tests for
CLUSTER?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"Investigación es lo que hago cuando no sé lo que estoy haciendo"
(Wernher von Braun)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-04 04:23:44 Re: Patch for "Bug of PL/pgSQL parser"
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-08-04 03:49:41 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-04 04:24:56 Re: inet support for contrib/array
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-04 03:47:20 Re: show() function - updated patch