| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fate of CLUSTER command ? |
| Date: | 2002-08-03 18:34:36 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0208031432160.7705-100000@cm-lcon1-46-187.cm.vtr.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oleg Bartunov dijo:
> I just tried CLUSTER command at fts.postgresql.org to cluster
> fts index and got very visual performance win. Unfortunately
> I had to restore permissions and recreate other indices by hand.
> So, I'm interested what's a future of CLUSTER command ?
I'm working on CLUSTER. I have a problem with dependency tracking right
now that I need to get fixed before the patch gets accepted, but that
shouldn't take long (hopefully).
The patch supposedly fixes all the concerns about CLUSTER (permissions,
other indexes, inheritance).
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
Officer Krupke, what are we to do?
Gee, officer Krupke, Krup you! (West Side Story, "Gee, Officer Krupke")
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-03 18:56:06 | cvs changes and broken links |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-03 18:20:53 | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |