From: | Daryl Herzmann <akrherz(at)iastate(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Queries not using Index |
Date: | 2002-07-24 01:57:15 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0207232050230.1226-100000@12-216-9-13.client.mchsi.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hi,
>You _have_ actually run ANALYZE on the table, right?
snet=# vacuum analyze t2002_06;
VACUUM
snet=# vacuum analyze;
VACUUM
snet=# explain analyze select * from t2002_06 WHERE station = 'SAMI4';
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Seq Scan on t2002_06 (cost=0.00..35379.69 rows=35169 width=47) (actual
time=20.51..1717.78 rows=38146 loops=1)
Total runtime: 1730.63 msec
EXPLAIN
snet=# set enable_seqscan=off;
SET VARIABLE
snet=# explain analyze select * from t2002_06 WHERE station = 'SAMI4';
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Index Scan using t2002_06_station_idx on t2002_06 (cost=0.00..132773.85
rows=35169 width=47) (actual time=74.86..299.53 rows=38146 loops=1)
Total runtime: 313.42 msec
EXPLAIN
Any thoughts? I am sorry to be causing all this trouble. I just want my
queries to voom-voom!! Interestingly enough, I see that the SEQ SCAN is
now estimated at 1730.63, when I first posted to this list, it was 3900.00
or so. Errrr
Thanks,
Daryl
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-07-24 02:09:17 | Re: Queries not using Index |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-07-24 01:47:18 | Re: Queries not using Index |