From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: plpgsql and Schemas |
Date: | 2002-07-15 22:55:02 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0207160036220.2259-100000@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Rod Taylor writes:
> I've been running a few functions within schema's. It's annoying that
> everything needs to be qualified as it doesn't allow the functions to be
> moved very easily.
> Would it be appropriate for the function to have it's own schema as
> pre-pended onto the user path while in the users function?
The SQL standard has rules on how the effective schema path during a
function execution is determined. In a nutshell, it allows you to specify
the path as an attribute of the containing schema. E.g.,
CREATE SCHEMA foo PATH here, there;
I haven't thought this through, but you might want to think about it.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-07-15 22:56:22 | OT: O'Reilly OSCon gatherings |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-15 22:54:42 | Future of src/utils |