From: | NunoACHenriques <nach(at)fct(dot)unl(dot)pt> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: tuplesort: unexpected end of data |
Date: | 2002-06-10 13:39:01 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0206101422300.21766-100000@students.fct.unl.pt |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>Can't you set up a situation where the failure is reproducible, then?
>On a day where you get the failure, dump the database and see if
>you can load the data into a fresh database and reproduce the problem.
>
Ok, I will do that...
>I don't necessarily believe the flaky-hardware theory, but I can't
>make much progress on the bug theory without a test case to look at.
>
Neither I believe it because the machine is well tested (including a
24h memtest). But there is something I can't get of my mind: once a day my
app "forces" PG to "play" with some 3GB of disk data in a ext2 fs. It is
known that sometimes ext2 corrupts data...
Thanks for the effort! :-)
--
o__ Bem haja,
_.>/ _ NunoACHenriques
(_) \(_) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://students.fct.unl.pt/users/nuno/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christoph Haller | 2002-06-10 13:42:10 | Efficient DELETE Strategies |
Previous Message | Tony Griffiths(RA) | 2002-06-10 13:27:24 | Re: Missing types in C header files |