| From: | Auri Mason <amason(at)syntrex(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: measure of JDBC performances |
| Date: | 2002-03-13 11:48:50 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0203131217460.22504-100000@mendeleev.syntrex.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi again Peter,
Thx for you feedback/opinion,
> It is not a wrong idea at all, but I do not think the difference between the
> performance of psql and JDBC should be significant.
My first idea was that the JDBC were the cause of low performances...
> and I found that PostgreSQL was the second best just a bit behind Interbase
Yeah, good news! This was the result as I'm aspecting!
> So my guess would be, that the observed huge performance gap between MS SQL
> and PostgreSQL can be explained either
>(1) by the specific way your Java server tier uses the JDBC connection
Could you explain me exactly what you mean?
>(2) some indexing problem
I'll check this ASAP!
THX, Auri
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nick Fankhauser | 2002-03-13 11:50:30 | Re: [JDBC] Fwd: DBvisualizer on MacOS X |
| Previous Message | Kovács Péter | 2002-03-13 11:08:08 | Re: measure of JDBC performances |