Re: measure of JDBC performances

From: Auri Mason <amason(at)syntrex(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: measure of JDBC performances
Date: 2002-03-13 09:57:36
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0203131050420.18895-100000@mendeleev.syntrex.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Hi Peter,

The Java server tier is running on P4 1900MHz 512MB and access via JDBC to
a DB that could be:
- PostgreSQL 7.2 - RH 7.2 (running on Celeron 733, 256MB)
- MS SQL 2000 SP2 - Win NT4 SP6 (running on a clone machine as Postgres,
same proc, same memory, same monitor! ;P )

The client is running on another machine, always the same for both MS SQL
and PostgreSQL tests (another clone of DBs machines).

Was the idea to measure the execution time with psql and via JDBC wrong?

Auri

On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Kovács Péter wrote:

> Given that PostgreSQL is running on Linux, I presume that the MS SQL Server
> is running on another machine. Could you describe the two machines
> (processor power, amount of main memory)? Where is your client? On a third
> machine?
>
> Peter

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kovács Péter 2002-03-13 11:08:08 Re: measure of JDBC performances
Previous Message Kovács Péter 2002-03-13 09:48:09 Re: measure of JDBC performances