| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: MATCH FULL flawed? |
| Date: | 2001-10-24 14:10:40 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0110222357500.11257-100000@aguila.protecne.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm trying MATCH FULL and it looks like it doesn't work (does anyone use
> > it anyway?).
>
> You're not using it right. You specified a separate MATCH FULL
> constraint for each column:
Thank you very much for the clarification. I was actually reading the
docs and couldn't find the right way to do it.
Now that I think about it: it's in the column_constraint part of the
definition! Shouldn't it only be in the table_constraint part? It
doesn't make much sense.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]atentus(dot)com>)
"La verdad no siempre es bonita, pero el hambre de ella si"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dominic J. Eidson | 2001-10-24 14:18:00 | Re: Disable Transaction - plans ? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2001-10-24 14:10:22 | Re: locking and web interfaces |