| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL and MySQL comparison. |
| Date: | 2001-08-29 20:41:54 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0108291640120.2693-100000@aguila.protecne.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Alexey Borzov writes:
>
> > I suppose PgSQL has to take a more active stance as well. Consider
> > "M$ vs Linux debates". Of course here both projects are Open Source so
> > the discussion should not be as heated... But I do think that
> > the statements in
> > http://www.mysql.com/doc/M/y/MySQL-PostgreSQL_features.html
> > should NOT go unanswered.
>
> Okay, I answered them:
>
> http://webmail.postgresql.org/~petere/comparison.html
Hmm... reading it suddenly I found that can't understand something. If
table bigger than 1 GB are split in different files, there is no "one
file per table". In that case, symlinking is not that safe... or is it?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]atentus(dot)com>)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew Kennedy | 2001-08-29 21:14:40 | url to free text search stategies in postgresql? |
| Previous Message | Robert J. Sanford, Jr. | 2001-08-29 20:33:08 | RE: RFC: PostgreSQL and MySQL comparison. |