Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility

From: Richard Troy <rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility
Date: 2007-03-06 17:05:22
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0703060901230.6547-100000@denzel.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Craig A. James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com> writes:
> > Bill Moran wrote:
> >> I have no idea if that's legally binding or not, but I've talked to a few
> >> associates who have some experience in law, and they all argue that email
> >> disclaimers probably aren't legally binding anyway -- so the result is
> >> undefined.
>
> > No, it's not legally binding. Agreements are only binding if both
> > parties agree, and someone sending you email has not consented to your
> > statement.
>
> To take this back to the PG problem: it's probably true that we can
> ignore disclaimers as far as receiving, redistributing, and archiving
> mail list submissions goes. On the other hand, accepting a patch is
> another matter.

A published policy on patch submission making them fit whatever legal
model is desired would avoid any and all legal issues related to legalease
included with a submission. The would-be patcher's action of submission
can also count as acknowledgement of the actual agreement - your
agreement - if you've got the policy unambiguously and prominently
displayed...

HTH,
RT

--
Richard Troy, Chief Scientist
Science Tools Corporation
510-924-1363 or 202-747-1263
rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com, http://ScienceTools.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neelam Goyal 2007-03-06 17:40:16 Automated test-suite for Postgres
Previous Message Ron 2007-03-06 16:58:15 Re: strange performance regression between 7.4 and 8.1