From: | Richard Troy <rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Patrick Earl <patearl(at)patearl(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1. |
Date: | 2007-01-11 22:01:53 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0701111356210.15093-100000@denzel.in |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
...snip...
>
> (You know, of course, that my opinion is that no sane person would run a
> production database on Windows in the first place. So the data-loss
> risk to me seems less of a problem than the unexpected-failures problem.
> It's not like there aren't a ton of other data-loss scenarios in that OS
> that we can't do anything about...)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
PLEASE OH PLEASE document every f-ing one of them! (And I don't mean
document Windows issues as comments in the source code. Best would be in
the official documentation/on a web page.) On occasion, I could *really*
use such a list! (If such already exists, please point me at it!)
Thing is, Tom, not everybody has the same level of information you have on
the subject...
Regards,
Richard
--
Richard Troy, Chief Scientist
Science Tools Corporation
510-924-1363 or 202-747-1263
rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com, http://ScienceTools.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-01-11 22:13:31 | Re: Trying to load MySQL data |
Previous Message | Jeanna Geier | 2007-01-11 22:00:52 | Re: RESTORE Error |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-11 22:26:55 | Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade |
Previous Message | Kim | 2007-01-11 21:52:23 | Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade |