| From: | Richard Troy <rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods |
| Date: | 2006-11-02 20:48:04 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0611021242540.1126-100000@denzel.in |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Username/password is not acceptable in a number of situations. This is
> not intended to replace them. This would be in *addition* to supporting
> the current auth methods. I don't understand at all how you feel it'd
> be nice to have yet shouldn't be done.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
...I thought you said this _needs_ to be done - by using words like
"unacceptible" and "required" - and I disagree. There's a difference
between what needs to be done and what is desired to be done. Further, I
never said "shouldn't."
Richard
--
Richard Troy, Chief Scientist
Science Tools Corporation
510-924-1363 or 202-747-1263
rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com, http://ScienceTools.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Henry B. Hotz | 2006-11-02 21:10:14 | Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-11-02 20:43:09 | Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods |